Boeing C-17 Globemaster III |
||
SpecificationsManufacturer Boeing Date in service January 1995 Type Transport Crew Three Engine Pratt & Whitney F117-PW-100 turbofan UsersU.S. Air Force DimensionsWingspan . . . . . . . . . . .169.8 ft Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174.0 ft Height . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55.1 ft Wing area . . . . . . . . .3,800 sq ft WeightEmpty . . . . . . . . . . .277,000 lb Max take-off . . . . . . 585,000 lb PerformanceMax speed . . . . . Mach number of 0.77 Range . . . . . . . . . . . .4,741 n mi |
|
|
Highlights of Research by Langley for the C-17
The C-17 is the newest airlift aircraft to enter the Air Force inventory. The C-17 is capable of rapid strategic delivery of troops and all types of cargo to main operating bases or directly to forward bases in the deployment area. The aircraft is also able to perform theater airlift missions when required. Using advanced aerodynamics and an innovative NASA powered-lift concept, the C-17 combines the load carrying capacity of the C-5 with the short takeoff and landing performance of the C-130. McDonnell Douglas was recognized in 1994 for the innovative design of the C-17 with the prestigious Collier Trophy, which is awarded annually for the greatest achievement in aviation in the United States. Fundamental and applied aeronautics research conducted at Langley in the areas of advanced high-lift systems, aerodynamics, advanced composites, and aeroelasticity contributed to the success of the C-17. Decades of Langley research efforts had conceived, developed, and matured emerging concepts and design guidelines that helped McDonnell Douglas produce this outstanding military transport. Langley facilities associated with research for the C-17 included the 30- by 60-Foot (Full-Scale) Tunnel, the 300-MPH 7- by 10-Foot Tunnel, the 16-Foot Transonic Dynamics Tunnel, the 8-Foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel, piloted simulators, and the Structures and Materials Laboratory. In an acknowledgement of Langley’s involvement in the C-17, McDonnell Douglas and the Air Force brought a C-17 to Langley on May 24, 1996, for a special ceremony to thank the employees for their contributions to the design of the C-17. |
||
Langley Contributions to the C-17 |
||
The CX Competition |
In the late 1970’s, the U.S. military recognized a growing demand for rapid deployment of military forces and equipment that would exceed the capabilities of the existing C-141, C-5, and C-130 fleets. Early in 1980, the Department of Defense (DOD) issued a request for proposals (RFP) for a new Cargo Experimental (CX) Program. Boeing, Lockheed, and McDonnell Douglas submitted variants of civil transports, derivatives of the prototype YC-14 and YC-15 aircraft, and completely new aircraft in response to the RFP. In August 1981, the Air Force announced that it had selected the Douglas Aircraft Company Division of McDonnell Douglas to develop the CX, now known as the C-17. Langley’s contributions to the development of the C-17 included years of consultation and cooperative research with the Douglas team, providing unique test facilities, and several innovative technological concepts. |
|
The Externally Blown Flap Concept |
The specifications for the C-17 transport required advanced concepts for superior short takeoff and landing (STOL) performance. As a result of Langley research on powered high-lift systems for over 35 years, the innovative externally blown flap (EBF) concept had matured to the point that it could be incorporated in the C-17 transport. The EBF enables the C-17 to make slow, steep approaches with heavy cargo loads to touch down precisely on the spot desired on limited runway surfaces. Because of this technology that was developed by Langley, the C-17 can carry the same loads as a C-5 and use the same airfields as a C-130. John P. Campbell of Langley conceived the EBF concept in the mid-1950’s as a relatively simple approach to augment wing lift for low-speed operations. In this concept, the exhaust from pod-mounted engines impinges directly on conventional slotted flaps and is deflected downward to augment the wing lift. The magnitude of lift augmentation is extremely large, and the resulting lift can be as much as twice the value for a conventional aircraft. However, no serious consideration was given to the EBF concept initially because of the severe high-temperature impingement on the wing and flap surfaces from the turbojet (no bypass or fan flow) engines used at that time. Also, the relatively small mass flow from such engines was a limiting factor for lift augmentation. In addition, considerable concern was expressed over potential control problems in the event that an engine became inoperative during flight at low speeds with high-power settings. With the advent of turbofan engines, however, the efflux from the engines was relatively cool, and large quantities of air became available for increased airflow through the flaps. The turbofan engine, therefore, provided the breakthrough mechanism that permitted Langley researchers to evolve and mature the applications of the EBF concept. At Langley, extensive wind-tunnel tests in the Langley 30- by 60-Foot (Full-Scale) Tunnel and the Langley 300-MPH 7- by 10-Foot Tunnel explored the fundamental lift-augmentation capability of the EBF for various wing-engine nacelle-flap combinations. These tests defined the optimum wing and flap geometries for application to aircraft configurations. Led by Joseph L. Johnson, Jr., a team of researchers in the Full-Scale Tunnel studied the aerodynamic performance of two- and four-engine EBF transport configurations. The scope of their research included detailed studies of projected aircraft performance, potential control problems and solutions, and design guidelines for the general geometric layout of the aircraft. The advantage of using a T-tail empennage configuration was identified as a desirable approach to avoid the large local downwash angles experienced at conventional tail locations due to the increased wing circulation produced by the EBF concept. The engine-out control issue was addressed and solved by defining the vertical tail and rudder size required to maintain directional control.
Langley researcher John P. Campbell
(l) and Gerald G. Kayten (r) of NASA Headquarters Dynamically scaled models of transport configurations vividly demonstrated the high-lift potential of the EBF concept, while exhibiting satisfactory stability and control characteristics, in free-flight wind-tunnel tests. Aerodynamic data generated by these studies were then used for piloted-simulator studies of EBF transports at Langley, during which more realistic evaluations of the handling qualities could be conducted and flight control systems could be configured. Throughout the years that the EBF concept developed and matured, Langley researchers coordinated with U.S. industry and DOD. Langley provided briefings and invaluable technical reports that summarized the findings of the research studies and the revolutionary capability offered by this new concept in aeronautics. In the late 1960’s, the progress on the EBF concept had advanced considerably, and most of the major issues had been adequately addressed and resolved. The concept was now ready for flight evaluation on an actual aircraft. Langley advocated for a special flight demonstrator program and conducted several studies of the feasibility of modifying existing aircraft as appropriate test beds. The Douglas A3 Skywarrior twin-engine, high-wing aircraft operated by the U.S. Navy appeared to be a desirable option; however, a new DOD program known as the Advanced Tactical Transport Program superseded the Langley plans. |
|
The YC-15 |
In 1972, the Air Force issued a request for proposals (RFP) for an Advanced Medium STOL Transport (AMST) that would ultimately replace the C-130 tactical transport. The program emphasized innovative technologies and the capability of conducting STOL operations from 2,000-ft runways. Boeing and McDonnell Douglas were each awarded preliminary design contracts for the construction and testing of two transport prototypes, respectively designated YC-14 and YC-15. Boeing based their YC-14 design on another powered-lift concept known as upper surface blowing (USB), which had also been developed at Langley in efforts led by Joseph Johnson and Oran W. Nicks, Deputy Director of Langley. In the USB concept, the engines were mounted so that the exhaust spread over the upper surface of the wing for enhanced circulation and lift augmentation in STOL operations. McDonnell Douglas used the EBF concept with a four-engine configuration and large double-slotted flaps that extended over 75 percent of the total span for the YC-15 prototypes. The first of two YC-15 prototypes made its first flight on August 26, 1975, and was joined by the second prototype in December of that year. The YC-15 demonstrated exceptional STOL performance in its flight-test program with an approach speed of only 98 mph and a field length of 2,000 ft at a landing weight of 150,000 lb. During the flight-test program for the YC-15, Langley researchers participated in evaluations and analysis of STOL capabilities, including an assessment of lift augmentation in ground effect. In addition to participating in the flight tests of the YC-15, Langley conducted a cooperative wind-tunnel test in the Langley 8-Foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel to evaluate the effectiveness of the emerging winglet concept, which was developed by Langley, on the YC-15 configuration. Dr. Richard T. Whitcomb’s winglet designs are small, wing-like vertical surfaces located at each wingtip that enable an aircraft to fly with greater efficiency. Winglets are strategically located at the wingtip to produce a forward force on the aircraft, similar in many respects to the sail on a sailboat. Although the YC-15 was never placed into production, the experiences gained by McDonnell Douglas in advanced wing design (supercritical airfoil and winglets), the EBF concept, and advanced controls for STOL operations gave the company confidence in future applications of these technologies to the C-17.
YC-15 model in the Langley 8-Foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel for an evaluation of winglets.
One of the McDonnell Douglas YC-15 prototypes in flight. |
|
The C-17 Supercritical Wing, Winglets, and Aerodynamic Studies |
The YC-15 was the first military transport to use supercritical wings, a major innovative technology conceived and developed through wind-tunnel research by Richard Whitcomb at Langley. Whitcomb’s supercritical wings incorporate advanced airfoils that enhance the range, cruising speed, and fuel efficiency of aircraft by producing weaker upper-surface shock waves, thereby creating less drag and permitting higher efficiency. McDonnell Douglas subsequently incorporated supercritical wing technology in the C-17 design. Whitcomb’s brilliant development of the winglet concept was another product of research at Langley that was ideally suited for the C-17. The C-17 is a large aircraft with a relatively small wing. The wingspan of the C-17 was dictated by an Air Force requirement for three aircraft to maneuver on a ramp measuring 90 m by 122 m that is connected by a 15-m-wide taxiway. The aerodynamic contribution of the winglets permits the C-17 to employ a shorter wing span while retaining the efficiency of a larger wing span. The C-17 winglets also employ supercritical airfoil sections. The successful application of winglets to the C-17 also required consideration and analysis of the flutter characteristics of the wing-winglet combination. This area was of particular concern because flow separation in the wing-winglet juncture could provide an aggravating mechanism that might lower the flutter speed to within the flight envelope of the C-17. Led by Charles L. Ruhlin, a Langley, McDonnell Douglas, and Air Force team conducted flutter tests on the C-17 wing-winglet configuration in the Langley 16-Foot Transonic Dynamics Tunnel and successfully cleared the aircraft for flight tests. Several cooperative wind-tunnel test studies were conducted by McDonnell Douglas and Langley in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the Langley Research Center to assess and optimize the cruise aerodynamic performance of the C-17. The unique capability of the NTF to more properly simulate full-scale aerodynamic flight conditions has been an extremely valuable contribution to the program.
Semispan model for the C-17 wing-winglet
configuration in the
C-17 model mounted in the National Transonic Facility at Langley for aerodynamic studies. |
|
Composite Materials |
The initiation of the Aircraft Energy Efficiency (ACEE) Program by NASA in 1976 in response to the energy crisis accelerated the development of concepts to improve the efficiency of advanced aircraft. New methods of producing unique, lightweight materials were one of the major thrusts of the ACEE Program, with emphasis on durable composite materials for aircraft structures. The Structures Division at Langley played a key role in developing the technology, which was ultimately incorporated on several components of the C-17. One of the most valuable Langley contributions in the ACEE Program was the development of graphite-epoxy upper aft rudders for the DC-10. The rudders have accumulated over 500,000 flight hours since they were introduced into regular airline service in 1976, thereby providing extensive experience for applications to other aircraft, including the C-17. Several major components of the C-17 are made of advanced composites (ailerons, rudders, elevators, vertical and horizontal stabilizers, flap hinge fairings, main landing gear pod panels, and winglets). Over 16,000 lb of composites are incorporated in the design, with composites accounting for about 8 percent of the structure. |
|
Fly-by-Wire Control System |
The extensive database and literature produced by pioneering research at Langley on fly-by-wire flight control systems and handling qualities of STOL transports provided McDonnell Douglas with a rich source of information in the development of the C-17 flight control system. Although not directly involved in this facet of the C-17 development program, Langley contributed fundamental research information that helped build the confidence and risk reduction required for the application of the sophisticated C-17 systems. |
|
Avoiding the Deep Stall |
The T-tail empennage configuration offers significant aerodynamic advantages over conventional designs. The relatively high location of the horizontal tail places the tail in a relatively undisturbed airflow at normal cruise conditions, thereby maximizing the contribution of the tail to stability and control. Many military and civil design teams have adopted this tail configuration very successfully. However, the application of the T-tail requires consideration of critical aerodynamic factors—especially an analysis in wind-tunnel tests to ensure satisfactory handling characteristics at extreme pitch attitudes. At high angles of attack associated with wing stall, the low-energy wake of the stalled wing can impinge on the horizontal tail and result in a loss of longitudinal stability (pitch up) and markedly reduced longitudinal control effectiveness. As a result of these flow phenomena, the angle of attack can increase to a deep-stall condition, in which the aircraft enters a stable but uncontrollable trim point with a very high rate of descent. In the early 1960’s, a British BAC 111 T-tail transport experienced a fatal accident in which the aircraft entered a deep stall and descended in an uncontrollable condition at a very high rate of descent with an almost horizontal fuselage attitude until impact. Worldwide interest in the causes of this accident resulted in a research program at the Langley Research Center on the behavior of T-tail configurations at high angles of attack. Under the leadership of Robert T. Taylor and Martin T. Moul, extensive wind-tunnel and piloted-simulator studies were conducted to determine the aerodynamic characteristics associated with deep-stall trim conditions and to develop design methods and pilot techniques to recover from such conditions. A large number of aircraft configurations were studied in the Langley 7- by 10-Foot High-Speed Tunnel, with an emphasis on designs with aft-fuselage-mounted engine nacelles. Studies at Langley on the T-tail deep-stall phenomenon provided a valuable database that has been used extensively in the design of numerous T-tail civil and military transport configurations. Perhaps the most valuable contribution of this work is the guidance and approach it suggests to the designer during early wind-tunnel tests and configuration layout. The C-17 design team was very familiar with the existing NASA database and design procedures for avoiding the deep-stall problem. The quadruple redundant digital fly-by-wire flight control system of the C-17 provides automatic limiting of angle of attack for high-angle-of-attack conditions, thereby preventing any tendency of the aircraft to enter an uncontrollable deep-stall condition. |
|
Recognition Visit |
On May 24, 1996, McDonnell Douglas and the Air Force brought a C-17 of the Air Mobility Command from Charleston Air Force Base, S.C., to Langley as a gesture of thanks to Langley and its employees for their contributions to the design of the new military jet transport. The visit and formal ceremony acknowledged the contributions of all four NASA Aeronautics Centers (Langley, Ames, Dryden, and Glenn) to the design and development of the C-17. The NASA research contributions cited by the visitors included the areas of powered-lift systems, short takeoff and landing control systems, head-up display technology, supercritical wing and winglet, fly-by-wire systems, engine technologies, and composite materials.
C-17 in front of the hangar during a visit at Langley on May 24, 1996. |
|
|
NASA Official |
Questions |
Page Curator |
Last Updated |